Which ideology is often contrasted with jingoism?

The correct answer, multilateralism, is contrasted with jingoism primarily in the context of foreign policy and international relations. Jingoism refers to an extreme form of nationalism that often advocates for aggressive foreign policy and military intervention, emphasizing the superiority of one’s nation while promoting a confrontational stance toward other countries. This ideology tends to prioritize national interests over global cooperation.

In contrast, multilateralism advocates for multiple countries working together to address global issues, emphasizing cooperation, dialogue, and consensus-building among nations rather than unilateral action. This approach seeks to foster peace and collaboration through international institutions and agreements, standing in stark opposition to the aggressive and exclusionary tendencies of jingoism.

Isolationism, while it may seem relevant, refers to a national policy of abstaining from foreign alliances and involvement, which does not directly counter the assertive nature of jingoism. Libertarianism focuses on individual freedoms and minimal government intervention, which is a different philosophical approach entirely. Collectivism emphasizes group goals over individual interests, which may not directly address nationalistic or internationalist ideologies. Therefore, multilateralism aligns most closely as a contrasting ideology to jingoism, promoting cooperation and collective action instead of aggression and unilateralism.